New Training Requirements for Licences

Current Headlines
>Growing Industry a Cause for Concern
>Traineeships Scams-Theft & Stealing
>New Training Requirements for Licences
>$5,000,000.00 Fine
<<View current stories

Special thanks to the QSA for allowing us to publish the articles.
All articles remain the property of their respective publishers.

The Union and some other Industry members mainly the large companies (who have a proven record of making things difficult for their competition) are calling for Probationary licences to be issued mainly to facilitate the employment of trainees. Q.S.A position is probationary licences should not be issued for the following reasons:

  • N.S.W issues probationary licences and Industry sources indicate the system is a failure.

  • It appears the only beneficiaries of any such scheme are the large foreign security companies who then use the traineeship scheme to obtain government subsidies (Australian Tax payers dollars).

  • Partially trained persons should be put at risk of injury and litigation.

  • Our public liability and professionally indemnity insurance premiums costs will sky rocket.

  • Consumers should not have to pay the full price for services not performed by fully trained and competent personnel

The excellent relationship we have developed with police could be jeopardised by probationary acting inappropriately.

The new training requirements for Security Officer/Crowd Controller licences came into effect on 1/1/2001.

The old training course was basically knowledge based training program, which gave the student knowledge about the Security Industry, the laws Security operatives need to know and the basics of operating procedures.

The Q.S.A. argued long and hard to retain this training program as basic entry-level training.

We believed that the units of competency in the Asset Security Training Package are poorly written, badly misaligned and rely on so called underpinning knowledge which is not taught and not assessed they should have been totally rewritten before introduction.

The result we believe will be many licence holders being charged both criminally and sued civilly because of the following:

  • Little or no attention is given to teaching students where they obtain their authority to do the job of a security Officer/Crowd Controller.

  • The training for crowd controls (the main reason for the introduction for the security providers act in Queensland) is almost non-existent.
  • Self defence and the use of force is not correctly addressed.

  • Too much emphasis is placed on security personnel doing the job of a Police Officer.

Although The Office of Fair trading acknowledges the shortcomings of the Asset Security Training package it was forced to adopt it to come into alignment with other states.

The following units of competency are now required for new licence applicants.

As reported in our story on traineeships some unscrupulous employers are suggesting current licence holders have to complete the Certificate 2 training course to renew their licence.

THIS IS NOT TRUE

IF YOU HAVE A CURRENT LICENCE ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS PAY THE RENEWAL FEE.

The union want the so called grandfather clause removed from the Security providers act thus forcing all licence holders to pay for Certificate level 2 training to renew their licence
.

   
  ©Trident Security
Services | Contact Us | News | Employment | Online Forms | Home